NAAC 3rd Cycle (2023) |
Self - Study Report |
---|
Criterion 2- Teaching-learning and Evaluation
2.1 - Student Enrolment and Profile |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.1 |
Enrolment percentage
Response : 73.24 2.1.1.1 Number of seats filled year wise during last five years (Only first year admissions to be considered)
2.1.1.2 Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.2 |
Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission during the last five years Response :81.75 2.1.2.1 Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories in the first year of the programme year wise during the last five years
2.1.2.2 Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GoI/State Govt. rule year wise during the last five years
|
2.2 - Catering to Student Diversity |
|||||||
2.2.1 |
The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes to cater to differential learning needs of the student
|
||||||
2.2.2 |
Student - Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
Response :13.43
|
2.3 - Teaching- Learning Process |
|||||||
2.3.1 |
Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experience and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process
|
||||||
2.3.2 |
The institution adopts effective Mentor-Mentee Schemes to address academics and student-psychological issues
|
||||||
2.3.3 |
Preparation and adherence of Academic Calendar and Teaching plans by the institution Describe the Preparation and adherence to Academic Calendar and Teaching plans by the institution.
|
2.4 - Teacher Profile and Quality |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2.4.1 |
Average percentage of full time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years
Response : 100 2.4.1.1 Number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2.4.2 |
Percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./ L.L.D during the last five years
Response : 25.54 2.4.2.1 Number of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./ L.L.D during the last five years
Response : 118
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2.4.3 |
Average teaching experience of full time teachers (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year, in number of years)
Response : 9.04 2.4.3.1 Total teaching experience of full-time teachers as of latest completed academic year
Response : 2667
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2.4.4 |
Percentage of full time teachers working in the institution throughout during the last five years
Response : 50.38 2.4.4.1 Number of full time teachers worked in the institution throughout during the last five years
Response : 132
|
2.5 - Evaluation Process and Reforms |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.5.1 |
Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the last date of declaration of results during the last five years
Response : 28.8 2.5.1.1 Number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results year-wise during the last five years
|
2.5.2 |
Percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five years
Response : 0.96 2.5.2.1 Number of complaints/grievances about evaluation year wise during last five years
2.5.2.2 Number of students appeared in the examination conducted by the institution year wise during the last five years
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.5.3 |
IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes including Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA)/Formative Assessment have brought in considerable improvement in Examination Management System (EMS) of the Institution
|
2.6 - Student Performance and Learning Outcomes |
|||||||||
2.6.1 |
The institution has stated learning outcomes (programme and course outcome)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the
website and other documents and the attainment of the same are evaluated by the institution
|
||||||||
2.6.2 |
Pass percentage of students (excluding backlog students) (Data for the latest completed academic year
Response : 81.52 2.6.2.1 Total number of final year students who passed the examination conducted by Institution during the latest completed academic year
Response : 816
|
2.7 - Student Satisfaction Survey |
|
2.7.1 |
Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process
|